Know IELTS Writing Band Score Immediately
with AI Examiner Evaluation
Analyze your IELTS Writing tasks instantly with AI. Get band scores and feedback on grammar, structure, and coherence in real time.
AI Score Report
Y:2023 M:Mar T:2
Student
Ying Yue
Test Type
Writing Test
Test Date
20 May 2025 at 10:13 am
Time Taken
48m 34s
Band Score
Overall Feedback
Well done on scoring a 7! To reach 8.0 in IELTS academic writing, focus on refining grammar accuracy and developing more complex arguments. Regular practice with a variety of topics will help.
Task Achievement: 6.5
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
Lexical Resource: 6.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 6.0
Task Achievement
You effectively describe and cover the overall trends and figures for the donor groups from 2006-2010. To improve, ensure that figures are accurately presented, like the 16 billion instead of million error. Clarify comparisons and provide more precise explanations of changes over the years.
Coherence and Cohesion
The response is logically organized, grouping information by years and donor groups, which aids understanding. However, transitions between years and groups could be improved for smoother flow. Consider varying cohesive devices to avoid repetition and enhance the connection between ideas.
Lexical Resource
Consider refining word choices, such as replacing 'comparatively comparable' with 'similar' and 'in the meantime' with 'during the same period.' Enhance precision by using more accurate terms like 'donations' instead of 'financial help' and ensure each term fits the context smoothly.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
The sentence structures display variety, but minor errors like article misuse and awkward phrasing impact clarity. Ensure figures like 'billion' vs 'million' are checked. Improving precision in grammar will enhance clarity and sophistication.
Question
Your Answer and Corrections
The table illustrates the amount of money the United States, Europe, and other countries allocated to developing nations between 2006 and 2010. Overall, the USA contributed much more than the other two groupings, making it the greatest donor over the period. In the meantime, annual donations from European and other nations were comparatively comparable. The United States provided $9.8 million in 2006, more than three times the sums donated by other nations ($2.8 million) and European nations ($3.1 million). In the years that followed, aid grew gradually until it reached $24.4 million in 2008, of which $16 billion came from the United States and $4.2 million and $4.1 million from Europe and other nations, respectively. The overall amount of donations decreased to $23.5 million in 2009, indicating a modest reduction. However, financial help increased once more in 2010, hitting the largest amount ever—$28.1 million. The United States gave $20.3 million, followed by Europe ($4.1 million) and other nations ($3.7 million).
Sample Answer
The table presents the amount of financial aid provided to developing countries by the USA, European countries, and other nations between 2006 and 2010. Overall, the USA was the largest donor throughout the period, contributing significantly more than the other two groups. Meanwhile, European and other countries donated relatively similar amounts each year. In 2006, the USA contributed $9.8 million, which was over three times the amount given by European countries ($3.1 million) and other countries ($2.8 million). Aid increased steadily in the following years, reaching a total of $24.4 million in 2008, with the USA contributing $16 billion, while European and other countries gave $4.2 million and $4.1 million, respectively. In 2009, there was a slight decline in donations, with total contributions dropping to $23.5 million. However, financial aid rose again in 2010, reaching $28.1 million, the highest figure recorded. Of this, the USA provided $20.3 million, while European countries contributed $4.1 million, and other countries donated $3.7 million.
Task Response: 7.5
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
Lexical Resource: 7.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 7.0
Task Response
Your essay clearly addresses the task by weighing functionality against aesthetics, offering relevant examples. To strengthen your argument, consider expanding on how aesthetics directly contribute to functionality or occupant satisfaction, linking these aspects more explicitly.
Coherence and Cohesion
Your essay is well-organized, with clear paragraphs and logical progression. To enhance coherence, improve transitions between ideas. Ensure all linking phrases are precise and correctly spaced to maintain fluency. Correct minor typos like 'fInhenIn' to avoid disrupting the flow.
Lexical Resource
Good use of terms like 'aesthetic design' and 'architectural decisions'. Ensure clarity by checking for typographical issues such as 'Nonethelessa' and 'fInhenIn'. Consider expanding your vocabulary range to further enhance your arguments.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
Your essay demonstrates a good range of complex sentences and accurate grammar. However, watch for minor punctuation errors and missing spaces, such as after periods. These small improvements could enhance clarity and coherence in your writing.
Question
Your Answer and Corrections
There has been continuous discussion about whether a building's intended use should take precedence over its external appearance. While some argue that a building's purpose should take precedence, others believe that aesthetics shouldn't be disregarded. Although I understand the importance of aesthetic design, I firmly believe that a building's purpose should come first. Then First and foremost, a building's usefulness and efficiency are directly impacted by its functionality. For instance, a building intended for office use needs roomy interiors, enough lighting, and cozy workstations. In the same vein, a hospital must place a high priority on patient management, cleanliness, and accessibility. Regardless of how nice the building appears from the outside, it fails to fulfill its purpose if these demands are not addressed. In the end, a building's architectural decisions should be determined by its intended use. Nonethelessa building's exterior still has a big impact on how its occupants feel about it overall. Aesthetics can contribute to a city's identity, foster innovation in the workplace, and make public areas feel pleasant. In addition to being useful, famous buildings like the Sydney Opera House and the Eiffel Tower serve as symbols of their respective towns, drawing tourists and boosting the local economy. Therefore, aesthetic considerations should complement the building's usage, even though practicality must come fInhenIn conclusion, even though I believe that a building's intended use should be the primary consideration in its design, its aesthetics shouldn't be overlooked. A room that strikes a balance between practicality and aesthetics can be both inspiring and useful, fulfilling its role while improving the surrounding area.
Sample Answer
The debate over whether the intended use of a building should be prioritized over its outward appearance has been ongoing. While some argue that the function of a building is of utmost importance, others believe that the visual appeal should not be overlooked. I strongly agree that the purpose of a building should be the primary consideration, though I also acknowledge the role of aesthetic design. First and foremost, the functionality of a building directly impacts its utility and efficiency. A building designed for office use, for example, requires spacious interiors, proper lighting, and comfortable workspaces. Similarly, a hospital needs to prioritize accessibility, hygiene, and the ability to manage large numbers of patients. If these needs are not met, the building fails in its purpose, regardless of how attractive it may look from the outside. Ultimately, a building’s usefulness should dictate its design choices. However, the outward appearance of a building still plays a significant role in the overall experience of the people using it. Aesthetics can inspire creativity in a workplace, create a welcoming atmosphere in public spaces, or contribute to a city’s identity. For instance, iconic structures like the Sydney Opera House and the Eiffel Tower are not only functional but are also symbolic of their respective cities, attracting tourists and enhancing the local economy. Therefore, while functionality must come first, aesthetic considerations should complement the building’s use. In conclusion, while I agree that the intended purpose of a building is the most important factor in its design, its appearance should not be neglected. A balance between functionality and beauty can result in a space that is both practical and inspiring, serving its purpose while enhancing the surrounding environment.
