Know IELTS Writing Band Score Immediately
with Expert Examiner Evaluation
Get your IELTS Writing assessed by certified examiners. Receive expert insights to enhance your task performance and score higher.
Expert Score Report
Y:2023 M:Mar T:2
Student
Rukiya Aziz
Test Type
Writing Test
Test Date
23 May 2025 at 06:31 am
Time Taken
49m 34s
Band Score
Overall Feedback
You achieved a score of 6.5. Focus on improving coherence and task response. Practice organizing ideas clearly and developing your arguments to boost your score.
Task Achievement: 6.0
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
Lexical Resource: 7.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 6.0
Task Achievement
Your response identifies key data but misses detailed coverage and clear comparisons. Improve by clarifying expressions like 'three time than Europe' and summarizing key features more effectively. Aim to accurately describe data for better task fulfillment.
Coherence and Cohesion
Work on improving sentence connection as many ideas are fragmented and awkwardly linked. Use cohesive devices like 'however' or 'furthermore' to enhance flow. Correct transitions can help clarify the sequence of changes in donation amounts over the years.
Lexical Resource
Try to expand your vocabulary by using synonyms for repetitive words like 'give' and 'money.' Explore more precise terms such as 'contribution,' 'aid,' or 'funding.' Also, be careful with word forms and collocations to enhance clarity and precision in your descriptions.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
Work on correcting subject-verb agreement issues, like 'The table show' should be 'The table shows.' Pay attention to verb tenses and plural forms, such as 'saw' to 'seen' and 'country' to 'countries.' Practice forming complex sentences for better variety.
Question
Your Answer and Corrections
The table show how much money donate to improving countries by USA, Europe countries and others between 2006 and 2010. It is in million dollar. Overall, it can saw USA give more money than other. There was some changing, but all three county go up in five year. In 2006, USA give more than three time than Europe, with $9.8 million. Europe and other countries was give $3.1 and $2.8 million. Then in next two years, all country was give more, and total reach $24.4 million. In 2009, all donate money little go down from 2008, total was $23.5 million. But in 2010, it go up again to $28.1 million. USA was give $20.3, and Europe and others give $4.1 and $3.7 million.
Sample Answer
The table presents the amount of financial aid provided to developing countries by the USA, European countries, and other nations between 2006 and 2010. Overall, the USA was the largest donor throughout the period, contributing significantly more than the other two groups. Meanwhile, European and other countries donated relatively similar amounts each year. In 2006, the USA contributed $9.8 million, which was over three times the amount given by European countries ($3.1 million) and other countries ($2.8 million). Aid increased steadily in the following years, reaching a total of $24.4 million in 2008, with the USA contributing $16 billion, while European and other countries gave $4.2 million and $4.1 million, respectively. In 2009, there was a slight decline in donations, with total contributions dropping to $23.5 million. However, financial aid rose again in 2010, reaching $28.1 million, the highest figure recorded. Of this, the USA provided $20.3 million, while European countries contributed $4.1 million, and other countries donated $3.7 million.
Task Response: 6.0
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
Lexical Resource: 6.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 6.5
Task Response
To enhance your argument, provide more detailed examples and expand on how the exterior and purpose are crucial in different contexts. Your conclusion should align with previous arguments to avoid contradictions and strengthen the overall position.
Coherence and Cohesion
Your essay follows a basic structure but needs better paragraph division. Some sections lack a clear focus, and transitions are weak. Improve flow by using cohesive devices like furthermore or however to connect ideas logically and enhance overall clarity.
Lexical Resource
Expand your vocabulary to avoid repetitiveness. For example, instead of repeating 'important' and 'look,' consider synonyms like 'significant' or 'appearance.' Be careful with word choice, ensuring words match intended meaning, and focus on more precise phrasing to enhance clarity.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
Focus on improving subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'people have,' 'a building looks'), tense consistency ('I think both are important'), and article usage ('its' vs. 'it's'). Regular practice with complex sentence structures and punctuation will enhance clarity and coherence.
Question
Your Answer and Corrections
People has different opinion about whether the purpose of building or it’s outside look is more important. I thinks both is important and should took in consideration. On one hand, how a building look from the outside is important for it’s success. Many businesses use the outsite design to attracting customers, which are a kind of marketing. For example, restorants and coffes often use their outside looks to get peoples attention and make them want to goes there. Also, nice-look buildings can helping the city to be more attractive for the tourists. However, even if the outside design important, its not the most important part when build something. Of course, the aperance matters too, but it don’t should be too much. On the other hand, its also important to think about how use a building is. First, the owner should designs the building based on him main purpose. This help to avoid problems later, like don’t have enough space or the right facilitys. Second, the value of a building depend on how people uses it. Focusing in this can help the business succeeding in the future. For example, when start a new company, it’s better to spending money on improve the services instead to spend too much on the outside look. In conclusion, many people is argue that the outer design of the building is more important than the use of place. I believe that use both strategy together is the best way to get success in the future.
Sample Answer
The debate over whether the intended use of a building should be prioritized over its outward appearance has been ongoing. While some argue that the function of a building is of utmost importance, others believe that the visual appeal should not be overlooked. I strongly agree that the purpose of a building should be the primary consideration, though I also acknowledge the role of aesthetic design. First and foremost, the functionality of a building directly impacts its utility and efficiency. A building designed for office use, for example, requires spacious interiors, proper lighting, and comfortable workspaces. Similarly, a hospital needs to prioritize accessibility, hygiene, and the ability to manage large numbers of patients. If these needs are not met, the building fails in its purpose, regardless of how attractive it may look from the outside. Ultimately, a building’s usefulness should dictate its design choices. However, the outward appearance of a building still plays a significant role in the overall experience of the people using it. Aesthetics can inspire creativity in a workplace, create a welcoming atmosphere in public spaces, or contribute to a city’s identity. For instance, iconic structures like the Sydney Opera House and the Eiffel Tower are not only functional but are also symbolic of their respective cities, attracting tourists and enhancing the local economy. Therefore, while functionality must come first, aesthetic considerations should complement the building’s use. In conclusion, while I agree that the intended purpose of a building is the most important factor in its design, its appearance should not be neglected. A balance between functionality and beauty can result in a space that is both practical and inspiring, serving its purpose while enhancing the surrounding environment.
